We argue that there is an additional reason for researchers to respect the dissent . Journal-integrated preprint sharing from Springer Nature and Research Square. We welcome people and content from all related fields. Under these circumstances, further experiments or technical work are usually required to address some or all of the referees concerns, and revised papers are sent back to some or all of the referees for a second opinion. A final decision on publication is deferred, pending the authors response to the referees comments. Decision sent to author->Waiting for revision . If the manuscript is transferred, the original reviewer reports and identities will be shared with the receiving journal (with the exception of transfers to the npj Series and Scientific Reports). Authors subsequently receive an e-proof, including the figures, and can also download a PDF proof of the layout. Answer: Decision in process status comes into the picture when the final decision is taken by the chief editor/editor in chief. ISSN 1476-4687 (online) Editors decisions are weighted according to the expertise of the referees, and not by a voting procedure. Thank the reviewers and editors for their time and comments. The login screen changed from live manuscript to post decision manuscript in a week, so I assumed it was desk rejected. reach a conclusion of interest to an interdisciplinary readership. The experts at Springer Nature Author Services can help you with manuscript preparationincluding English language editing, developmental comments, manuscript formatting, figure preparation, translation, and more. After all revisions have been made (papers may be returned to the author more than once for revision), if the paper is found suitable for publication in a GSA journal, the Science Editor will send a final decision letter to the author, accepting the manuscript for publication. Finding reviewers who agree to deal with the paper - another week. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. How do Editors reject an Editorial Manager submission and - Elsevier Can I ask the editor to publish a withdrawn manuscript after acceptance? In my opinion, a simple Gaussian function would have sufficed. These are considered appeals, which, by policy, take second place to consideration of normal submissions. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? For more information, please see our For example; too small a sample size or missing or poor controls, Poor analysis such as using inappropriate statistical tests or a lack of statistics altogether, Inappropriate methodology for answering your hypothesis or using old methodology that has been surpassed by newer, more powerful methods that provide more robust results, Weak research motive where your hypothesis is not clear or academically valid, or your data does not answer the question posed, Inaccurate conclusions on assumptions that are not supported by your data, Not enough of an advance or of enough impact for the journal, Research ethics ignored such as consent from patients or approval from an ethics committee for animal research, Lack of proper structure or not following journal formatting requirements, Lack of the necessary detail for readers to fully understand and repeat the authors analysis and experiments, Lack of up-to-date references or references containing a high proportion of self-citations, Has poor language quality such that it cannot be understood by readers. Most manuscripts are sent out for peer review. Authors and their institutions are advised to coordinate any of their own publicity with the Journals and Editorial press office by e-mail after their paper is accepted for publication. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles Geology: https://geology.msubmit.net If you do not think you will be able to return a revised manuscript in the allotted time tell the editor immediately. If an author wishes to appeal against Nature's decision, the appeal must be made in writing, not by telephone, and should be confined to the scientific case for publication. var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); The editor and the editorial team discuss the reviewer reports, and decide whether the manuscript or a revised version of it could be published in the journal. //-->We've all felt this way : r/labrats - Reddit These reviewers then need sufficient time to conduct a thorough review on your manuscript. //--> For more information,please refer to our FAQ page. Thank you for visiting nature.com. [CDATA[// >process - Geological Society of America What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? The paper is rejected because the referees have raised considerable technical objections and/or the authors claim has not been adequately established. You can access the status of your manuscript at any time by: This procedure will display detailed tracking information about where your manuscript is in the submission/peer-review process. Visit our main website for more information. Here to foster information exchange with the library community. Icons made by various authors from www.flaticon.com, Experiential Live Edit: How to improve Biomed manuscripts. Differentiate between reviewer comments and your responses in your letter. The decision is sent to the author. Authors are usually informed within a week if the paper is not being considered. "Editor decision started" means that the editor is actively reading the manuscript. Once the decision has been made to peer-review the paper, the choice of referees is made by the editor who has been assigned the manuscript, who will be handling other papers in the same field, in consultation with editors handling submissions in related fields when necessary. Scan this QR code to download the app now. and JavaScript. All Rights Reserved. Editing and proofreading services for a publication-ready manuscript, Customized service packs to match all publication needs, Expert help for all academic translation needs. Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. Brij M Upreti Good research journals mention time of processing in journal home page, but that time is average time, which also include desk rejection as first decision in that average.. //--> If the manuscript has been peer-reviewed, authors should include a note explaining any changes made to the manuscript compared to the original Nature Plants submission, along with a separate point-by-point response to the reviewer reports. The judgement about which papers will interest a broad readership is made by Nature's editors, not its referees. any technical failings that need to be addressed before the authors' case is established. Connect with us on LinkedIn and stay up to date with news and development. Reviewers are expected to treat the manuscript confidentially. It is disappointing when you are rejected from a journal however it is important to know when it is appropriate to contest a decision and when to submit to another journal. Can we write a courteous mail asking about the status change from 'Decision Made' to 'Under Consideration'? How do I write an inquiry to the editor about my manuscript's current status? Please see our guidelines for initial submission to make sure that you provide us with all necessary information at this stage.