Holding your eye in the proper position is way easier. Eyepiece Field of View - Apparent: 82 Eyepiece Focal Length: 8 mm Eyepiece Eye Relief: 12 mm Eyepiece Series: Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle Eyepiece Weight: 6.5 oz. Telescope Eyepieces Guide - High Point Scientific Those look just like the WO UWANs, and they are in the exact same focal lengths. Just teasing you, David. Stellarvue 8mm UWA Ultra Wide Angle 82 degree 1.25" Eyepiece - New However, stars began to bloat 60 percent out from the center and were quite distorted at the edge. So from a practical point of view, I find there's little difference in drift time. And if you like the UWANs, see my review of the WO XWA. Anyone know who makes the StellarVue Planetary eyepieces? Your grading system is A+, A, B, C, D and E (Fail). If so, you will need eyepieces with longer eye relief. These wider fields allow me to see things with my peripheral vision and make the whole experience that much more comfortable and enjoyable. Stellarvue makes great scopes and youll love yours. I like short UWA's as I only use muscle drive mounts, and I don't have a UWA in 4mm. Haven't noticed these before. I find the Televue better, but both the ES and UWA are very close. I've had both and they are excellent (and same price)! But it is an excellent eyepiece, for $80 less than the Tele Vue Ethos. I had the pleasure of looking through all of the Optimus eyepieces with Vic at the DSSP. In the refractor, though, the 4.5 Morpheus comes into its own, with plenty of drift time with a focal length over 1100mm shorter. Cons: Very aberrated off-axis star images; slightly less than 82 field. New guy struggling with eyepiece decisions - Cloudy Nights I like having eyepieces at my fingertips. Good correction comes with a price. While the NexStar SE/Evolution Celestron, Celestron Tabletop Tripod, NexStar SE. Tele Vues Type 6 Naglers are small, light and tack sharp across the field, even on fast f-ratio telescopes. The Stellarvue Ultrawide eyepiece set includes three eyepieces: 4.0 mm 1.25" Ultrawide angle eyepiece with 82 degree apparent field of view ( click here for specifications) 8.0 mm 1.25" Ultrawide angle eyepiece with 82 degree apparent field of view ( click here for specifications) Bottom Line: A superb eyepiece for 2-inch focusers. I have never used 100o EP's but they are larger/heavier so you might have balance issues depending on scope/mount setup. Ive never been a fan of zoom eyepieces. You currently have javascript disabled. Cool, thanks for the info! Munich | Germany, History, Population, Oktoberfest, Map, & Facts Munich, Bavaria, Germany Monthly Weather | AccuWeather Never occurred to me that they might actually be the same. All of my scopes are on manual mounts, so I agree, the larger the AFOV the better. I think they are made by the same company that made other brands, Orion, Zhumell, SmartAstronomy, et al. I tried them out on the SV60, several other small refractors and with a friend's TOA-130. Nice wide field. It is plenty wide enough and 1.25 inch 82 degree eyepieces are just so much more compact than their 100 degree counterparts. Those I find are easiest to use. Orion sold them as did WO too. I don't use 2" eyepieces that much so I'm not interested in the 28mm, and for some reason the 7mm eyepieces that I have are rarely used. Joining an astronomy club can also put more eyepieces in your focuser to the test. Uhno. The jump from 50 to 70 provides a much larger leap than 70 to 100 to my eyes. Bottom Line: A superb and compact top-class eyepiece. As objects get smaller, and magnification gets higher, I think I appreciate a view that is tightened up a bit. Don't have an Astromart account? Report back witn with your thoughts when you get a chance. Bottom Line: Economical but with optical flaws. My conclusion from testing this 82 group was that the Explore Scientific came very close to matching the standard-setting premium Tele Vue Nagler, but at a lower price. The 4.5mm Morpheus is sharper than the Ethos SX, by a hair. Certainly a keeper. Now if you had a more expensive 30mm EP, that FOV will remain sharper to the edge. Pinpoint stars to the edge, M27 is amazing in my 14" Dobsonian. Click here to simulate the field of viewhttps://astronomy.tools/. Stars are sharp across all but the outer 20 percent. Add 1/8" if rolled up. Astro-Tech's 20mm XWA: An Affordable Extreme-Field Eyepiece Though advertised as 80, I found the apparent field matched a Naglers 82 field. You will get more use out of middle and low magnification EP's now. So that this makes sense - take your 30mm SuperView, focus on a nice cluster of stars (M45 akaPleiades is a great one). Cons: Field less than others; eyecup height not easily adjustable. I would be very surprised to find out that this new Stellarvue line is not the same as the new TS UWAN line. The Stellarvue 82 is well made, with a compact, solid construction, good 14mm of eye relief (better than the stated 12mm) and a fold-up eyecup. STELLARVUE OPTIMUS 20MM 100deg 2.0'' 9-ELEMENT EYEPIECE That doesn't happen with 100 degree eyepieces. Seeing the outer 10 degrees in direct vision is not so easily done. Note the Meades middle-weight 638 gram mass and that both the Meade and Omegon are just for 2-inch focusers, requiring more costly 2-inch filters. Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) #48, Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) #52, private (state-approved) University of Applied Sciences, View all 231 courses still open for next intake, Marketing services for German Universities. Based on the 14mm SSW, I can recommended the series, though they are even more costly than Nagler Type 6s. Light Benders: 2" Astro-Physics MaxBright, 2" iStar dielectric, 2" Stellarvue Deluxe, 2" TAL/ NPZ dielectric, 2" Baader Amici prism . Guess I never answered the OP's real question here - favorite FOV, lol. Has anyone out there tried both or have any thoughts? I did sell a lot of axiom LXs though, and owned the 23mm for a while and was impressed with it. Edited by 25585, 06 March 2023 - 09:04 AM. When I decided that I wasn't agreeing with an eyepiece, I sold it back on the used market for what I paid for it. Introducing the Stellarvue Optimus eyepiece series. (1) it seems that for observer favorite FOV is defined by nature of human eye: 120-140 deg. I figured out my preferred fov and eye relief by purchasing used eyepieces here on CN. I've been looking at purchasing some additional eyepieces from those that came with my AD8 Apertura (9mm and 30mm). Astromania now sells a 32mm, but I suspect it is a 31mm Luminos. The value for current overall gradeis the numerical value corresponding to your current overall letter grade. Accessories, Astrophotography gear, Reviews. Edited by Alex Swartzinski, 05 March 2023 - 11:02 PM. Your scope is a f5.9. Back in my youth I worked for a company that "made" computer monitors and the OEM was required to make it to our specs, but others were not. On my f/5 to f/6 test scopes, stars started to distort 50 percent out from the center and were quite bloated at the edge, the poorest optical performance of the group, but one thats commensurate with price. Bottom Line: A better bargain 82 eyepiece. Going Wider: Five 100-Degree Eyepieces Compared, A Beginners Guide to Telescope Eyepieces, Price and Quality in a High-Power Zoom: SVBONY 3mm-8mm Zoom Review, Celestron Tabletop Tripod Review: Sometimes Smaller is Better. For planets 30-40 deg. Another good example is the 50mm finderscope, from both WO and SV (I have both, mostly the same, both excellent). Personally, I find the 70-72 degree range perfect for my needs and taste; and there are plenty of offerings in that range with adequate effective eye relief for eyeglass wearers. I can easily watch a close double drift past the field stop of a type 6 Nagler and often do. An important factor is whether you have astigmatism in your observing eye and need to wear glasses when observing,. While still impressive, they arent as wide as the others. A best buy. It is been known for a long time that the 7mm UWAN is closer to 8mm, so maybe the previously given field stop specifications have been misrepresented so that the focal length-FOV equation should add up on paper(?). Anyway, my main concern was trying to get most or all of the Pleiades in my view. Has similar build quality to TeleVue and has a better feel than its APM counterpart. 15mm Stellarvue is identical to the 14mm ES 82, field curvature and all, as noted above. They are still the best but are expensive. In my 80/480 refractor, I find even 50 degrees for "high" power to be quite good--e.g., Nagler 3-6 zoom. I knew they were re-branded. A great one-two punch when observing. All important info for international students in Germany (2023/2024), 0 (90 programs for EU citizens/Non-EU), 21,000 per semester (1 program for EU citizens/Non-EU), Program Fees: 0 - 10,000 (per semester), Program Fees: 0 - 9,750 (per semester), Frankfurt School of Finance and Management, Hochschule der Bayerischen Wirtschaft (HDBW), Hochschule Fresenius - University of Applied Sciences. I once read that Televue actually bench tests all of their eyepieces before delivery to their customers or dealers; if so they may be unique in this regard. While the rubber eyecup can fold down, it is stiff enough that it is best left up. At 580 grams, it is the heaviest of the 82 set. This is an enthusiast's forum - these folks typically take good care of their stuff. Here is a good listing of who actually makes applianceshttp://www.appliancehase/make.shtml. It was definitely one of the better ones, as the 24uwa/es82 is, and likely the exact same optics. Anyone tried them? I see only two, a 9mm and a 6mm. Stars are Nagler-class sharp to the edge even on the Newtonians. Notice how it's sharp in the center and as you get to the edge the stars grow tails? Edit: For clarification, I am referring to the apparent field of view of eyepieces, not the true field of view. For a lighter, lower-cost alternative, and for 1.25-inch focusers, you might wish to consider an 82 eyepiece. }. #32 Times Higher Education Ranking. The apparent field is indeed noticeably wider than the other 82s. That is a beast and my first 2 eyepiece. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. Like twins separated at birth, Meades MWA (Mega Wide Angle) looks nearly identical to the Omegon Panorama2. All in all, exactly what you'd expect from Stellarvue: A great product at a reasonable price. display: none !important; I find the 82 degree fields of my Explore Scientific 9mm to be less accessible, though it is a nice sharp view. New from Stellarvue, ultra-wide eyepieces. Though if you want the best, this is it. Pros: Lightest 100 with good eye relief. I think you got a nice deal on those eyepieces and I bet they work just fine. Stellarvue EOP-09.0 The main drawback is the massive 833 gram weight, by far the highest of the 100s. Alan Dyer is an astrophotographer and astronomy author based in Alberta, Canada. Reducer Flatteners for other telescopes, Finderscope Eyepieces with Focusing Reticle, Barlows to double the power of your eyepieces, Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle Eyepiece Set - EUW-SET, Stellarvue Optimus Eyepiece Set with Case - EOP-SET, Stellarvue 4 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-04.0, Stellarvue 15 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-15.0, Stellarvue 8 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-08.0. My conclusion upon testing this 100 group was that performance was more or less commensurate with price. I have a tendency to increase the apparent field as the magnification goes up so I don't have to push the dob quite as much. Very comfortable, bright and sharp. Please note that this tool is only intended to provide a first orientation and the results are in no way binding. Once you look through eyepieces with 82 apparent fields, all lesser eyepieces give the impression of looking down a tunnel. Grade Conversion using the Bavarian Formula. Bottom Line: A top-class eyepiece for optics and build quality. of Students: approx. I do not wear glasses while observing and a 70-degree field of view is very comfortable. Anything more than 82 would have me wasting time rolling my head seeing "what's out there" vs concentrating on what's in the center of the field.